<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quoted in Computerworld on Outlook slowness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jasonclarke.net/archives/2007/03/20/quoted-in-computerworld-on-outlook-slowness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jasonclarke.net/archives/2007/03/20/quoted-in-computerworld-on-outlook-slowness/</link>
	<description>Software, Hockey, and random ramblings.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 05:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonclarke.net/archives/2007/03/20/quoted-in-computerworld-on-outlook-slowness/#comment-100938</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 21:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonclarke.net/archives/2007/03/20/quoted-in-computerworld-on-outlook-slowness/#comment-100938</guid>
		<description>Hi Denis,

Yes, Google's IMAP implementation seems to leave a bit to be desired, but I'm currently using it for both my personal and work email accounts and managing them both through Apple's Mail application, and it's certainly workable. I like having the option of viewing all of my email in a unified inbox. 

Good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Denis,</p>
<p>Yes, Google&#8217;s IMAP implementation seems to leave a bit to be desired, but I&#8217;m currently using it for both my personal and work email accounts and managing them both through Apple&#8217;s Mail application, and it&#8217;s certainly workable. I like having the option of viewing all of my email in a unified inbox. </p>
<p>Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denis</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonclarke.net/archives/2007/03/20/quoted-in-computerworld-on-outlook-slowness/#comment-100937</link>
		<dc:creator>Denis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 20:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonclarke.net/archives/2007/03/20/quoted-in-computerworld-on-outlook-slowness/#comment-100937</guid>
		<description>Hi Jason
Do you use imap for receiving mail from Google by Apple Mail?
Sometimes it's work not so good with imap I see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jason<br />
Do you use imap for receiving mail from Google by Apple Mail?<br />
Sometimes it&#8217;s work not so good with imap I see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonclarke.net/archives/2007/03/20/quoted-in-computerworld-on-outlook-slowness/#comment-100901</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 06:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonclarke.net/archives/2007/03/20/quoted-in-computerworld-on-outlook-slowness/#comment-100901</guid>
		<description>Hi Cam. You're right, I don't seem to have written much at all about Nelson Email Organizer (NEO). Unfortunately, I stopped using MS Outlook over a year ago when I moved off of Windows to a Mac. 

Briefly, NEO takes a different approach to email productivity, focusing on fast searching and presenting emails to the user in ways that are organized in the way you think about the emails - for example, you can see all emails to and from a specific contact in an instant. It doesn't have the Getting Things Done type of task management functionality that Clear Context has. I used both plugins at the same time and enjoyed the features of both. Hope this helps!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Cam. You&#8217;re right, I don&#8217;t seem to have written much at all about Nelson Email Organizer (NEO). Unfortunately, I stopped using MS Outlook over a year ago when I moved off of Windows to a Mac. </p>
<p>Briefly, NEO takes a different approach to email productivity, focusing on fast searching and presenting emails to the user in ways that are organized in the way you think about the emails - for example, you can see all emails to and from a specific contact in an instant. It doesn&#8217;t have the Getting Things Done type of task management functionality that Clear Context has. I used both plugins at the same time and enjoyed the features of both. Hope this helps!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cam Johnston</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonclarke.net/archives/2007/03/20/quoted-in-computerworld-on-outlook-slowness/#comment-100900</link>
		<dc:creator>Cam Johnston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonclarke.net/archives/2007/03/20/quoted-in-computerworld-on-outlook-slowness/#comment-100900</guid>
		<description>Jason in the article you mention Nelson Email Organizer, I have not been able to find any of your older posts where you discuss the product especially how it compares and contrasts with ClearContext. Would you mind pointing in the right direction to find these? Googling has not worked thus far

Thanks and keep up great commentary, it is wonderful</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason in the article you mention Nelson Email Organizer, I have not been able to find any of your older posts where you discuss the product especially how it compares and contrasts with ClearContext. Would you mind pointing in the right direction to find these? Googling has not worked thus far</p>
<p>Thanks and keep up great commentary, it is wonderful</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
