Software, Hockey, and random ramblings.
19 Feb
Clearly I’m not the only person in the world that has experienced slowness in Microsoft Outlook; “Outlook slow” is the second most searched-for phrase that leads people to this site, behind “eye twitch”. I have to say that although I’m somewhat happier with Outlook 2007, it’s still not as good as it ought to be. In fact, on a daily use basis, I find Gmail is noticeably snappier.
This includes when I shut off the Outlook add-ons that I have come to rely on; I know that adding things on to an application that I find to be already somewhat slow isn’t all that smart, but there’s no way I’d live without ClearContext or NEO Pro, never mind Anagram.
And in terms of Gmail, it’s not like I don’t add functionality on there too; using greasemonkey, I’m able to add on saved searches, added hotkeys and even conversation previews. But the speed difference is still somewhat astounding.
Although I’m comparing Outlook 2007 to Outlook 2003, I have to keep in mind that I’m using 2007 on a faster computer that has a true dual-core processor. So in fact, it’s probably more than likely that Outlook hasn’t gotten any faster at all between the 2003 and 2007 versions.
The worst slow-down I experience is when Outlook is actually checking my POP mail account, which is the only way that I actually receive email into Outlook. The problem is FAR worse if I’m checking multiple accounts, but it’s really bad even with one, particularly when there are a lot of messages to download. I can’t for the life of me figure out why such a modern application can’t handle the rigors of checking mail, something that email clients have been doing forever.
Colour me frustrated.
Drop me a note if you also have trouble with Outlook slowness, and if you’ve had any success speeding it up I’m all ears!
Tags: Outlook, Microsoft Outlook, Outlook 2007, Outlook slowness, Outlook slow, MS Outlook, email
Add New Comment
Viewing 22 Comments
Thanks. Your comment is awaiting approval by a moderator.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
I have to admit I'm a bit of a hoarder and used to keep every email received and sent. I managed to speed outlook up quite considerably by regularly archiving items over 6 months (or so) old.
Of course, if you want to retrieve something it becomes a pain in the backside ...
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Outlook 2007 falls short of meeting expectations. ---
Lookout Search utility with Outlook 2003 outperforms 2007's search speed by a wide margin. I would like to see instant search results, and clear configuration for index scheduling.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
I however did find out that it is a "incompatible bug" in loading the security-settings in outlook 2003. (start OL2003 and open options|security|click-OK fixed the problem untill OL2003 was closed!!!).
Wierd things happen... How many have the "slow outlook" with Internet Explorer 7?
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Better yet, why dont you go back to Outlook 97. This will make it quicker.
To move ahead with all of the bells and whistles for Outlook 2007 there are bound to be some initial problems, bugs and even slowness. Thats what being on the "bleeding" edge of technology is and always has been about.
I'm sick of people ranting about the problems with Office2007 - Its a brand new package, if you dont like it dont use it, and wait for the next service pack!
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
The one thing I could also suggest with the index for Outlook2007 is to exclude the index database from your virus scanners - I have found this can slow everything down dramatically.
Phil
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
I have an open case with MS regarding the issue and it is classified as a bug (and is reproduceable by them). I have been waiting for a buddy drop/hotfix for several months, but nothing yet.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
I also found out why it happens. The rendering engine grabs the first 5 URLs for analysis (is there an image to download, etc.). Then it grabs the first 5 and the next 5 and does it again. Then it grabs the first 10 and the next 5. So it is redundantly processing every link. You can imagine the time it will then take to render an email with 500 links (as I get for reports).
Scott
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
I dont disagree with you, but I was referring to Outlook 2003.
My point is that it could be IE7 thats causing the problem with Outlook 2003 and 2007.
(I'll dig into the indexing/rss things if I reinstall IE7)
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Any ideas? Am using broadband connection (3.5Mbps), and laptop is a Rock XCTX with T2700, and 2Gb RAM.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
http://www.microsoft.com/office/community/en-us...
So far it has significantly sped up my Outlook 2007 performance. Opening Outlook as well as opening attachments is much faster.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
I have a dual boot system still running XP Pro and also Vista Ultimate. I don't do this very often because it screws up my rules in Outlook when I do it but my wife checked email while I was booted up in XP and checked to see how much slower Ol2007 was using XP and the same letters that took 5 to 10 seconds to open in Vista-Ol2007 opened instantly in XP-Ol2007.
This surprised me.
Just thought you'd like to know that.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
1. Outlook hangs whilst receiving pop3 mail
Deleting the various files as outlined above - this made no difference here.
Outlook 2007 - Clean install on Vista - Both fully ptached up to date. PST file is only about 350Mb and compressed using the built in feature.
The hanging is clearly obvious on some messages - it does appear to do it on all messages though - so there might be merit in the thread regarding it checking various links in an email, but I checked the ones it hangs on and it only had a couple of links, so it's not obvious what the issue is there.
I've tried the idea of changing the TCP Receive window:
From the Command prompt:
netsh interface tcp set global autotuninglevel=disable
If you do this when Vista Runs a repair it will warn that it's been changed and want to set this back to autotuninglevel=auto (so this is easy to revert)
To show current settings:
netsh interface tcp show global
It's possble this makes a difference, but I don';t think it's made much for me!
The Worst problem for me though is this:
2. when working with attachments in a new message outlook often crashes completely and closes losing everything I've worked on - I always tell it to send the
error reports to Microsoft - ARE YOU LISTENING!!!
I believe this occurs when I add an attachment, then open the attachment from that message BEFORE I have saved the message. I think that if I save the message first then it will generally be OK afterwards.
It's also posisble that the hanging on send/receive is actually causing a problem with the open email process, so that if I write a long email then an auto send/receive happens this causes the problem for my attachment.
MY PST File is in my home folder which is on a server - so not sure if that makes any difference yet.
John
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Add New Comment