<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s not the email that sucks&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jasonclarke.net/archives/2005/12/15/its-not-the-email-that-sucks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jasonclarke.net/archives/2005/12/15/its-not-the-email-that-sucks/</link>
	<description>Software, Hockey, and random ramblings.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 21:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Itzy Sabo</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonclarke.net/archives/2005/12/15/its-not-the-email-that-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-6154</link>
		<dc:creator>Itzy Sabo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 18:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonclarke.net/archives/2005/12/15/its-not-the-email-that-sucks/#comment-6154</guid>
		<description>Agreed that SNARF it not the answer. I also don't think that throwing technology at this particular problem will fix it. IMHO brute-force solutions that use complex algorithms to analyze our accumulated email and watch how each of us interacts with the rest of the world will not work. 

By the way, I used to be a Piler, but now I'm a Filer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed that SNARF it not the answer. I also don&#8217;t think that throwing technology at this particular problem will fix it. IMHO brute-force solutions that use complex algorithms to analyze our accumulated email and watch how each of us interacts with the rest of the world will not work. </p>
<p>By the way, I used to be a Piler, but now I&#8217;m a Filer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
