<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Outlook 2003 Slowness - The Saga Continues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jasonclarke.net/archives/2005/04/08/outlook-2003-slowness-the-saga-continues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jasonclarke.net/archives/2005/04/08/outlook-2003-slowness-the-saga-continues/</link>
	<description>Software, Hockey, and random ramblings.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonclarke.net/archives/2005/04/08/outlook-2003-slowness-the-saga-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-739</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2005 21:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonclarke.net/archives/2005/04/08/outlook-2003-slowness-the-saga-continues/#comment-739</guid>
		<description>I haven't come across that option, but it sounds interesting. I sort of gave up on worrying about sending attachments. I figure that the person on the other end can figure out how to deal with the file properly. I agree that ideally you should be able to point everyone to one central copy of a file, but if for any reason that is not easy to do, I just forward the attachment. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t come across that option, but it sounds interesting. I sort of gave up on worrying about sending attachments. I figure that the person on the other end can figure out how to deal with the file properly. I agree that ideally you should be able to point everyone to one central copy of a file, but if for any reason that is not easy to do, I just forward the attachment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bw</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonclarke.net/archives/2005/04/08/outlook-2003-slowness-the-saga-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-721</link>
		<dc:creator>bw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2005 20:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonclarke.net/archives/2005/04/08/outlook-2003-slowness-the-saga-continues/#comment-721</guid>
		<description>PITA... I had to look that one up!

Slightly off topic.... but what do you think of a ''cc without attachments" option for outlook email or email clients in general?  I work in one of those impaired organizations that don't have a uniform document management or file sharing system company wide.  I like to send emails with hyperlinks, but there's always one or two recipients that I have to send the  attachment.  As much as I hate it, I clog everyone's inbox with redundant bytes...  ccWOA ... that sounds good!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PITA&#8230; I had to look that one up!</p>
<p>Slightly off topic&#8230;. but what do you think of a &#8221;cc without attachments&#8221; option for outlook email or email clients in general?  I work in one of those impaired organizations that don&#8217;t have a uniform document management or file sharing system company wide.  I like to send emails with hyperlinks, but there&#8217;s always one or two recipients that I have to send the  attachment.  As much as I hate it, I clog everyone&#8217;s inbox with redundant bytes&#8230;  ccWOA &#8230; that sounds good!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonclarke.net/archives/2005/04/08/outlook-2003-slowness-the-saga-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-720</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2005 22:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonclarke.net/archives/2005/04/08/outlook-2003-slowness-the-saga-continues/#comment-720</guid>
		<description>I really like that Outlook is a complete PIM. I just wish it wasn't also a complete PITA. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like that Outlook is a complete PIM. I just wish it wasn&#8217;t also a complete PITA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Maddocks</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonclarke.net/archives/2005/04/08/outlook-2003-slowness-the-saga-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-719</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Maddocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2005 18:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonclarke.net/archives/2005/04/08/outlook-2003-slowness-the-saga-continues/#comment-719</guid>
		<description>I'd love to get rid of Outlook completely.  I really would.  It's too bad Thunderbird doesn't offer Exchange support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love to get rid of Outlook completely.  I really would.  It&#8217;s too bad Thunderbird doesn&#8217;t offer Exchange support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
